Published in

Oxford University Press (OUP), Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2(497), p. 1391-1403, 2020

DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1935

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Machine learning classification of Kuiper belt populations

Journal article published in 2020 by Rachel A. Smullen ORCID, Kathryn Volk ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the outer Solar system, the Kuiper belt contains dynamical subpopulations sculpted by a combination of planet formation and migration and gravitational perturbations from the present-day giant planet configuration. The subdivision of observed Kuiper belt objects (KBOs) into different dynamical classes is based on their current orbital evolution in numerical integrations of their orbits. Here, we demonstrate that machine learning algorithms are a promising tool for reducing both the computational time and human effort required for this classification. Using a Gradient Boosting Classifier, a type of machine learning regression tree classifier trained on features derived from short numerical simulations, we sort observed KBOs into four broad, dynamically distinct populations – classical, resonant, detached, and scattering – with a >97 per cent accuracy for the testing set of 542 securely classified KBOs. Over 80 per cent of these objects have a >3σ probability of class membership, indicating that the machine learning method is classifying based on the fundamental dynamical features of each population. We also demonstrate how, by using computational savings over traditional methods, we can quickly derive a distribution of class membership by examining an ensemble of object clones drawn from the observational errors. We find two major reasons for misclassification: inherent ambiguity in the orbit of the object – for instance, an object that is on the edge of resonance – and a lack of representative examples in the training set. This work provides a promising avenue to explore for fast and accurate classification of the thousands of new KBOs expected to be found by surveys in the coming decade.

Beta version