Published in

Oxford University Press (OUP), Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2(492), p. 1841-1854, 2019

DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3567

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

On the survival of cool clouds in the circumgalactic medium

Journal article published in 2019 by Zhihui Li ORCID, Philip F. Hopkins ORCID, Jonathan Squire ORCID, Cameron Hummels ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

ABSTRACT We explore the survival of cool clouds in multiphase circumgalactic media. We revisit the ‘cloud-crushing problem’ in a large survey of simulations including radiative cooling, self-shielding, self-gravity, magnetic fields, and anisotropic Braginskii conduction and viscosity (with saturation). We explore a wide range of parameters including cloud size, velocity, ambient temperature and density, and a variety of magnetic field configurations and cloud turbulence. We find that realistic magnetic fields and turbulence have weaker effects on cloud survival; the most important physics is radiative cooling and conduction. Self-gravity and self-shielding are important for clouds that are initially Jeans-unstable, but largely irrelevant otherwise. Non-self-gravitating, realistically magnetized clouds separate into four regimes: (1) at low column densities, clouds evaporate rapidly via conduction; (2) a ‘failed pressure confinement’ regime, where the ambient hot gas cools too rapidly to provide pressure confinement for the cloud; (3) an ‘infinitely long-lived’ regime, in which the cloud lifetime becomes longer than the cooling time of gas swept up in the leading bow shock, so the cloud begins to accrete and grow; and (4) a ‘classical cloud destruction’ regime, where clouds are eventually destroyed by instabilities. In the final regime, the cloud lifetime can exceed the naive cloud-crushing time owing to conduction-induced compression. However, small and/or slow-moving clouds can also evaporate more rapidly than the cloud-crushing time. We develop simple analytic models that explain the simulated cloud destruction times in this regime.

Beta version