Published in

Oxford University Press (OUP), Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 1(493), p. L22-L27, 2020

DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa004

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Not so fast: LB-1 is unlikely to contain a 70 M⊙ black hole

Journal article published in 2020 by Kareem El-Badry ORCID, Eliot Quataert
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

ABSTRACT The recently discovered binary LB-1 has been reported to contain a ${∼ }70\, \mathrm{M}_{⊙}$ black hole (BH). The evidence for the unprecedentedly high mass of the unseen companion comes from reported radial velocity (RV) variability of the H α emission line, which has been proposed to originate from an accretion disc around a BH. We show that there is in fact no evidence for RV variability of the H α emission line, and that its apparent shifts instead originate from shifts in the luminous star’s H α absorption line. If not accounted for, such shifts will cause a stationary emission line to appear to shift in antiphase with the luminous star. We show that once the template spectrum of a B star is subtracted from the observed Keck/HIRES spectra of LB-1, evidence for RV variability vanishes. Indeed, the data rule out periodic variability of the line with velocity semi-amplitude $K_{\rm H\,α } \gt 1.3\, {\rm {km}} \, s^{-1}$. This strongly suggests that the observed H α emission does not originate primarily from an accretion disc around a BH, and thus that the mass ratio cannot be constrained from the relative velocity amplitudes of the emission and absorption lines. The nature of the unseen companion remains uncertain, but a ‘normal’ stellar-mass BH with mass 5 ≲ M/M⊙ ≲ 20 seems most plausible. The H α emission likely originates primarily from circumbinary material, not from either component of the binary.

Beta version