Published in

Oxford University Press (OUP), Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 4(487), p. 5721-5738, 2019

DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1593

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Probing dark matter structure down to 107 solar masses: flux ratio statistics in gravitational lenses with line-of-sight haloes

Journal article published in 2019 by Daniel Gilman, Simon Birrer ORCID, Tommaso Treu, Anna Nierenberg, Andrew Benson ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Strong lensing provides a powerful means of investigating the nature of dark matter as it probes dark matter structure on sub-galactic scales. We present an extension of a forward modelling framework that uses flux ratios from quadruply imaged quasars (quads) to measure the shape and amplitude of the halo mass function, including line-of-sight (LOS) haloes and main deflector subhaloes. We apply this machinery to 50 mock lenses – roughly the number of known quads – with warm dark matter (WDM) mass functions exhibiting free-streaming cut-offs parametrized by the half-mode mass mhm. Assuming cold dark matter (CDM), we forecast bounds on mhm and the corresponding thermal relic particle masses over a range of tidal destruction severity, assuming a particular WDM mass function and mass–concentration relation. With significant tidal destruction, at 2σ we constrain $m_{\rm {hm}}\lt 10^{7.9} \left(10^{8.4}\right) \, \mathrm{M}_{⊙ }$, or a 4.4 (3.1) keV thermal relic, with image flux uncertainties from measurements and lens modelling of $2{{\ \rm per\ cent}} \left(6{{\ \rm per\ cent}}\right)$. With less severe tidal destruction we constrain $m_{\rm {hm}}\lt 10^{7} \left(10^{7.4}\right) \, \mathrm{M}_{⊙ }$, or an 8.2 (6.2) keV thermal relic. If dark matter is warm, with $m_{\rm {hm}} = 10^{7.7} \, \mathrm{M}_{⊙ }$ (5.1 keV), we would favour WDM with $m_{\rm {hm}} \gt 10^{7.7} \, \mathrm{M}_{⊙ }$ over CDM with relative likelihoods of 22:1 and 8:1 with flux uncertainties of $2{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ and $6{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$, respectively. These bounds improve over those obtained by modelling only main deflector subhaloes because LOS objects produce additional flux perturbations, especially for high-redshift systems. These results indicate that ∼50 quads can conclusively differentiate between WDM and CDM.

Beta version