Published in

Oxford University Press (OUP), Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2020

DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa262

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The relationship between X-ray and optical absorbers in active galactic nuclei

Journal article published in 2020 by Gunnar W. Jaffarian, C. Martin Gaskell ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract We present a large compilation of reddening estimates from broad-line Balmer decrements for active galactic nuclei (AGNs) with measured X-ray column densities. The median reddening is E(B − V) ≈ 0.77 ± 0.10 for type-1 to type-1.9 AGNs with reported column densities. This is notably higher than the median reddening of AGNs from the SDSS. We attribute this to the selection bias of the SDSS towards blue AGNs. For other AGNs we find evidence of a publication bias against reporting low column densities. We find a significant correlation between NH and E(B − V) but with a large scatter of ±1 dex. On average the X-ray columns are consistent with those predicted from E(B − V) for a solar neighbourhood dust-to-gas ratio. We argue that the large scatter of column densities and reddenings can be explained by X-ray column-density variability. For AGNs with detectable broad-line regions (BLRs) that have undergone significant changes of Seyfert type (“changing-look” AGNs) we do not find any statistically significant differences in NH or E(B − V) compared to standard type-1 to type-1.9 AGNs. There is no evidence for any type-1 AGNs being Compton-thick. We also analyse type-2 AGNs and find no significant correlation between NH and narrow-line region reddening. We find no evidence for a previously claimed anti-correlation. The median column density of LINERs is 22.68 ± 0.75 compared to a column density of 22.90 ± 0.28 for type-2 AGNs. We find the majority of low column density type-2 AGNs are LINERs, but NH is probably underestimated because of scattered light.

Beta version